runsense

Grade-Adjusted Pace (GAP)

By Runsense · Reviewed by Raphael Crawford-Marks, Founder · Last reviewed October 20, 2026

Grade-adjusted pace (GAP) is a number that running apps show to restate your pace on a hill as the flat-ground pace they estimate would cost the same effort. It is an app's estimate and not a measurement, and it differs from app to app. It is useful for comparing runs afterward and a poor guide to pace during a run, where effort does the job. This guide covers what the number is, what slopes cost, where it misleads, and how to use it. This is general training guidance.

What it is

GAP is an estimate that an app makes, and your watch does not measure it. Strava describes it as pace adjusted for the steepness of the terrain, an estimate of the equivalent pace on flat land. On a climb your GAP is faster than your actual pace and on a descent it tends to be slower, and Strava says it does not account for the technical difficulty or condition of the terrain1. COROS describes standard GAP as built from population data and says its own Effort Pace is built from each athlete's training history2. Every maker builds its own model, so compare a GAP figure only with figures from the same app or watch.

What a slope costs

Uphill, the energy cost of each meter rises roughly in a straight line with the grade. Downhill, it falls to a minimum somewhere between 10 and 20 percent downhill and then rises again on steeper slopes3. In a 2022 study of 8 well-trained trail runners on a treadmill at about 60 percent of their maximal oxygen uptake, a meter at +15 percent cost about 2.2 times a level meter, and a meter at -15 percent cost about 70 percent of one4. So a 15 percent climb costs more than twice the flat meter, and a 15 percent descent saves less than a third. The descents give back far less than the climbs take, which is why a rolling route is slower than a flat one at the same effort. Do not expect to hold your flat-road pace over hills, and do not read the slower pace as lost fitness.

Where the number misleads

Steep descents are where it misleads most. Strava says its downhill adjustment peaks at around 10 percent downhill and eases on steeper slopes1. Pace on a steep descent is limited by braking and leg damage more than by energy: in a review, muscular stress from lengthening contractions, and not heart and lung capacity, appeared to be what limits intense descents3. Run a steep descent at a speed you can control and treat its adjusted pace as a rough guess. The guide on downhill running covers how to run and train them.

Heart rate is a poor check on a descent. At the same speed it is lower running down than up, yet hard descents at 70 percent of maximal oxygen uptake pushed heart rate and breathing rate toward their maximum3.

Rough ground costs more than the number knows. In a 2022 study of 10 experienced male trail runners who climbed for about 10.5 minutes at racing pace, oxygen cost on two trails was 10.5 percent higher, and ventilation 21 percent higher, than on a treadmill set to the same slope, speed and distance5. On rough trail, expect to be slower than your GAP implies and go by effort.

A fixed adjustment cannot show fatigue. Running economy drops after a big descent3, so the same adjusted pace costs more late in a run with a lot of descent than early in it. Heat and altitude are separate adjustments too: COROS says its Effort Pace adjusts only for hill grade, not for weather or altitude2.

How to use it

Use GAP after the run and effort during it.

Safety

Run downhill at a speed you can control and walk when the footing is beyond your skill, whatever an adjusted pace suggests. A GAP number is an estimate of effort, not a safe speed.

Sources

  1. Strava Help Center. What is Grade-Adjusted Pace (GAP) on Strava? Strava's own description of its feature, not research. ↩
  2. COROS. Introducing Effort Pace. COROS's own description of its feature, not research. ↩
  3. Lu Z, Suo B, Deng L, Wang J, Fu W, Zhong Y, Jin J. A review of uphill and downhill running: biomechanics, physiology and modulating factors. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 13:1690023 (2025). (Narrative review of studies of graded running (search to July 2025)) ↩
  4. Lemire M, Remetter R, Hureau TJ, Geny B, Lonsdorfer E, Favret F, Dufour SP. Energy Cost of Running in Well-Trained Athletes: Toward Slope-Dependent Factors. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 17(3):423-431 (2022). (8 well-trained male trail runners on a treadmill at -15%, 0% and +15% at about 60% of maximal oxygen uptake) ↩
  5. Nicot F, Sabater-Pastor F, Samozino P, Millet GY, Rupp T. Effect of ground technicity on cardio-respiratory and biomechanical parameters in uphill trail running. European Journal of Sport Science 22(12):1836-1846 (2022). (10 experienced male trail runners running uphill at racing pace on two trails and on a treadmill) ↩

One running guide a week.

Calm, useful, no spam. Plain-English coaching from the Runsense team, once a week.